Fall Prevalence and Contributors to the Likelihood of Falling in Persons with Upper Limb Loss

While Nina Bondre, CPO is no longer with us at Dankmeyer, she left some columns behind so that we could continue to post topics of interest in the Dankmeyer Download space. This particular one concerns falls in those with upper limb loss.

Fall risk is often associated with lower limb amputees, both before and after provision of their prosthesis. Recent research has demonstrated that upper limb loss can also increase fall risk. Arm motion during walking helps to maintain balance, and when there is upper limb loss, this balance can be compromised. In those with upper limb loss, they rely more heavily on their legs to maintain balance. The results of this study point to the need for falls screening and encouraging physical therapy for improving balance and reducing fall risk.

The author surveyed 105 participants with upper limb loss (at or above the wrist) and found that 28.6% reported 2 or more falls in the past year. 45.7% fell at least once in the last year. These falls are likely associated with "reduced balance confidence, use of upper limb prostheses, and reduced physical capabilities". 30% of the reported falls occurred while walking outdoors, and 30% were during ascending or descending stairs. Most of the falls are associated with losing balance, tripping, or slipping. The recommendation from this study is to focus physical therapy on improving balance, and how to recover from trips and stumbles. 

The original research for this article can be found in the Oxford Academic and you can read it by clicking here.

This is a article in the April 2019 issue of PT in Motion that is written about the original research. You can further explore this topic by clicking here.



Targeted Muscle Reinnervation

Today we will be talking about targeted muscle reinnervation or TMR.  TMR is a technique developed by Dr. Gregory Dumanian and Dr. Todd Kuiken in the last decade. More than just the bone is cut in an amputation: muscles, tendons, ligaments, soft tissue, and nerves. Sometimes the nerves become "irritated" when they no longer have a muscle to innervate and control. This can make it challenging to use a prosthesis that operates based on nerve signals, as without a muscle to innervate, the signal may not be as strong as before the amputation.

This type of prosthesis, called a myoelectric prosthesis, uses electrodes that read muscle signals to operate a component of the prosthesis.  By using the technique of targeted muscle reinnervation, the nerves that no longer communicate with the original muscle are buried in a different muscle. Once the nerve grows into the new destination muscle, the signals it produces are stronger than prior to the procedure.

It was also discovered during the development of this procedure that  TMR may be used to address phantom limb pain. When nerves no longer have a muscle to communicate with, they can send signals to the brain that are registered as phantom limb pain. TMR has been shown to help with phantom limb pain, in addition to improving signals for use with myoelectric prostheses. The procedure is complex, and is ideally timed with the amputation, which can be challenging based on the situation and type of amputation. However, there is also the option to pursue this procedure after the amputation has been completed.

For more information on this topic you can visit the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health reference by clicking here. Or, this reference from the Journal of the American Medical Association by clicking here.




Pattern Recognition Technology for Upper Limb Prosthesis Users

Welcome to our new blog, Dankmeyer Download!!  Hosted by Nina Bondre, CPO, each month we will introduce a topic of interest or recent research in our field.  We hope you enjoy these discussions of the latest research, techniques, and developments in the fields of orthotics and prosthetics.

Dankmeyer, Inc. and Infinite Biomedical Technologies (IBT) hosted a course together at Dankmeyer’s Baltimore Washington area office (Linthicum, MD) in early April, focusing on new technologies for upper limb prosthetic users. Sean McHugh from IBT presented to a group of occupational therapists from Johns Hopkins Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and practitioners from Dankmeyer about IBT’s new pattern recognition technology, Sense. We were fortunate to have several of our patient models attend to allow participants to work with upper limb prosthesis users. Participants had the opportunity to find ideal electrode locations on patient models' residual limbs, and also try out the IBT Sense training and programming software. 

Myoelectric prostheses are prostheses that use the EMG (electromyography) signals from muscle contractions to drive actions. Traditionally, prosthetists would work with patients to identify distinct muscle contractions and signals, and place the electrodes accordingly. Electrodes pick up the electrical muscle signals. Based on what signal the user generates, either by contracting one muscle group versus another (and in some cases, based on length of time and contraction strength), different actions occur in the prosthesis. For example, one muscle group/electrode may be associated with opening the prosthetic hand, and the other muscle group/electrode will close the prosthetic hand. 

Pattern recognition still uses EMG signals from electrodes, but operates off of the combination of signals from these various electrodes. Whereas prosthetists would need to carefully locate electrodes in the previous designs and make sure they were not overlapping, pattern recognition focuses on using the distinct patterns generated by someone's muscle contractions, rather than firing one muscle group versus another. This allows for more intuitive control of the prosthesis, and allows this type of prosthesis to be available to a wider range of users. Traditional myoelectric control for some users was challenging, as the requirements for distinct muscle signals controlled so carefully was difficult to train. One of the advantages of the IBT system is that there is intuitive training software that allows users to train on the system and fine tune their patterns at home. 

You can read more about IBT's Sense system by clicking here: Sense system. We recently featured IBT and some of this research in a patient story, as told by Dr. Andrew Rubin. You can read his story by clicking here.

If you have any questions for Nina about this topic or any other, email us at info@dankmeyer.com. Suggestions are also welcome!

Here is a gallery of photos from the course!